For aarch64-apple and aarch64-windows, platform docs state that code
must use frame pointers correctly. This is because the AAPCS64 mandates
that a platform specify its frame pointer conformance requirements:
- Apple: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/xcode/writing-arm64-code-for-apple-platforms#Respect-the-purpose-of-specific-CPU-registers
- Windows: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/arm64-windows-abi-conventions?view=msvc-170#integer-registers
- AAPCS64: https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/blob/4492d1570eb70c8fd146623e0db65b2d241f12e7/aapcs64/aapcs64.rst#the-frame-pointer

Unwinding code either requires unwind tables or frame pointers, and
on aarch64 the expectation is that one can use frame pointers for this.
Most Linux targets represent a motley variety of possible distributions,
so it is unclear who to defer to on conformance, other than perhaps Arm.
In the absence of a specific edict for a given aarch64-linux target,
Rust will assume aarch64-linux targets use non-leaf frame pointers.
This reflects what compilers like clang do.

`CStringArray` contained both `CString`s and their pointers. Unfortunately, since `CString` uses `Box`, moving the `CString`s into the `Vec` can (under stacked borrows) invalidate the pointer to the string, meaning the resulting `Vec<*const c_char>` was, from an opsem perspective, unusable. This PR removes removes the `Vec<CString>` from `CStringArray`, instead recreating the `CString`/`CStr` from the pointers when necessary. Also,`CStringArray` is now used for the process args as well, the old implementation was suffering from the same kind of bug.

std: fix aliasing bug in UNIX process implementation

`CStringArray` contained both `CString`s and their pointers. Unfortunately, since `CString` uses `Box`, moving the `CString`s into the `Vec` can (under stacked borrows) invalidate the pointer to the string, meaning the resulting `Vec<*const c_char>` was, from an opsem perspective, unusable. This PR removes removes the `Vec<CString>` from `CStringArray`, instead recreating the `CString`/`CStr` from the pointers when necessary. Also,`CStringArray` is now used for the process args as well, the old implementation was suffering from the same kind of bug.

…d-use-frame-pointers, r=compiler-errors

aarch64-linux: Default to FramePointer::NonLeaf

For aarch64-apple and aarch64-windows, platform docs state that code must use frame pointers correctly. This is because the AAPCS64 mandates that a platform specify its frame pointer conformance requirements:
- Apple: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/xcode/writing-arm64-code-for-apple-platforms#Respect-the-purpose-of-specific-CPU-registers
- Windows: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/arm64-windows-abi-conventions?view=msvc-170#integer-registers
- AAPCS64: https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/blob/4492d1570eb70c8fd146623e0db65b2d241f12e7/aapcs64/aapcs64.rst#the-frame-pointer

Unwinding code either requires unwind tables or frame pointers, and on aarch64 the expectation is that one can use frame pointers for this. Most Linux targets represent a motley variety of possible distributions, so it is unclear who to defer to on conformance, other than perhaps Arm. In the absence of a specific edict for a given aarch64-linux target, Rust will assume aarch64-linux targets also use non-leaf frame pointers. This reflects what compilers like clang do.

…k-Simulacrum

Updated std doctests for wasm

This updates some doctests that fail to run on wasm. We will soon be supporting cross-compiled doctests, and the test-various job fails to run these tests. These tests fail because wasm32-wasip1 does not support threads.

…crum

Update mdbook to 0.4.50

This updates mdbook to 0.4.50 which brings in several changes, and specifically a fix for syntax highlighting in rust-by-example.

Changelog: https://github.com/rust-lang/mdBook/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#mdbook-0450